Indicators on case law on bail on new facts You Should Know
Indicators on case law on bail on new facts You Should Know
Blog Article
Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Smaller fees apply.
Because the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is arrived at, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
For your foregoing reasons the moment suit is dismissed with no order as to cost. Office to prepare decree in the above terms. Read more
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice with the Peace u/s 22-A is not obliged to afford a possibility of hearing to your accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to take into account all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are some of the relevant factors. Read more
However it can be made apparent that police is free to consider action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities topic to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused to your petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of legislation. Police shall also make certain respect in the family get rid of in accordance with legislation and if they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they could act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall safe concrete evidence and obtain necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate as being a issue of security of the house is concerned, which isn't public place under the Act 1977. nine. Contemplating the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition continues to be attained. For that reason, this petition is hereby disposed of inside the terms stated over. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 40 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, It's also a nicely-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is issue on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by legislation." It can be perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is very well-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety times. Should the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she will then approach the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the ninety times for the department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided by the decision from the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
Problems or Errors In case you encounter any technical problems with this website (for instance a poor link or possibly a portion of the opinion missing), please notify the eService Middle.
17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have listened to the realized counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this facet for interim custody of the subject premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises read more in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to make sure the Act's effective implementation in line with its unique purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor diploma(s) in the topic of cooperative societies. Read more